The Flanders Panel by Arturo Perez-Reverte: Chess and Murder

An erudite and gripping thriller, Arturo Perez-Reverte’s The Flanders Panel uses two arguably low-key elements (art restoration and chess) and turns them into the building blocks for an intelligent puzzle. I tore through my copy of this book in a couple of days until the reveal at the end, swept away by the descriptions of the Madrid art scene, the sharp dissection of chess gameplay and motivations, the reimagining of political intrigue in 15th Century Flanders.

The story begins with Julia, an art restorer tasked to refurbish a work by Flemish master Pietr Van Huys. The painting depicts three important figures within Flanders at the time, with two of them locked in an intense game of chess. While an important piece of art that could potentially generate millions in auction, there was nothing unusual about the painting until x-rays show a hidden message beneath it. Soon, an old lover of Julia’s dies mysteriously, and she can’t shake the certainty that the death is connected with the painting, somehow.

I took away a lot of things from this novel. My own fascination with the philosophical aspects of board games like chess and Go made me very receptive to the discussion of chess as metaphor for murder. The intricacies and jargon relating to chess is handled so deftly by Perez-Reverte that I never felt it was ever over my head. Julia’s character, though I found her quite distant at the beginning, combines both defiance and vulnerability as she’s beset by circumstances that are beyond her control.

The only thing that didn’t sit well with me is the scene where the identity of the villain is finally revealed. While the murderer’s motivations seem plausible in retrospect, I found the handling of the denoument overwrought and sloppy. I’ve found that I’m very seldom satisfied by the ending of mystery novels, despite my unabashed love for them.

A couple of years ago I came across an essay by China Mieville positing that the reason why the ending of mysteries always end up disappointing is because it is essentially a collapse of quantum possibilities. I’ve mulled over that idea for a long time, and I think it’s quite an apt description for my ambivalence with mystery endings.

The ultimate disappointment aside, I still found The Flanders Panel quite a whirl, and heartily recommend it to anyone who likes thrillers with a lot of bite and intelligence.


4 thoughts on “The Flanders Panel by Arturo Perez-Reverte: Chess and Murder

  1. I think I have to agree with that observation about the end of the mystery. It almost always feels like a betrayal of sorts. Even if there’s a certain pleasure to have been able to solve the mystery yourself, it still feels disappointing when it actually ends.

    • I’m still thinking about what my ideal mystery story ending. I think Eco’s The Name of the Rose comes the closest. I don’t know how to feel about reveals that only lead to another mystery, it’s a good technique in theory but it ends up infuriating the reader, I’d imagine. XD

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s